Paul McCartney’s Death in 1966 Goes Much Deeper Than an MI5 Replacement Operation

Paul McCartney’s Death in 1966

Audio in video below:

TMR Editor’s Note
Years prior to the The Millennium Report website going online one of our writers conducted exhaustive research into the “Paul McCartney is Dead” conspiracy.  It is, in fact, a real conspiracy because of the number of willing participants who, by necessity, had to participate in it in order for it to be successful for almost fifty years.Paul McCartney Death 1966 MI5

However, only one element has been missing over the past 49 years. And that is a member of The BEATLES stepping forward to tell the unvarnished truth. It now appears that this little secret has been finally told by Ringo Starr. Certainly, with the death of his band mates, except ‘Paul’ of course, the burden of this secret became greater for him to carry alone as the years wore on.


The newsprint piece shown above well captures the respective roles of the four BEATLES. What it fails to point out is that Ringo Starr was not only the drummer, he was also the heartbeat of the band as all drummers are. It now appears that the true story about Paul is Ringo’s to tell or else the heartbeat would become increasingly labored by the sheer weight of the harder-to-hide truth (The internet has a way of doing that, yes?). There is no one else who has the authority, by virtue of his firsthand experience with the whole wild and crazy affair, like Ringo Starr.

The “exhaustive research” conducted over several years did produce an extraordinary amount of evidence pointing to the great likelihood that the original Paul McCartney did leave The BEATLES circa 1966.  There is now a massive body of forensic proof, anecdotal testimony, scientific photograph assessment, comparative voice analysis, circumstantial evidence, etc. on the internet which supports Ringo Starr’s ‘alleged’ revelations.

The following article appears to be correct in stating all the primary facts with the exception of the very last paragraph as follows:

“The British MI5 also announced an investigation to determine if an imposter could have indeed posed for 48 years as the Member of the Order of the British Empire, Sir James Paul McCartney, during official ceremonies involving Queen Elizabeth II.”

Surely, it was MI5 which coordinated the entire cover up, since they were best positioned to ensure that the conspiracy of silence would stick for so many years.

flaming pie_07

As for why The BEATLES agreed to go along with the cover up scheme since 1966 — the answer, especially if you were living during the 1960s and had sisters who could sing every single BEATLES song with perfection, is quite obvious. Paul McCartney’s death would have triggered an unprecedented shock to his millions of young and often delirious female fans around the entire world.

For a much better explanation of just how traumatic such a shocking revelation would have been in 1966, the following true story is presented for the reader’s edification.

“During The BEATLES performance at Shea Stadium, which kicked off their 1965 US Tour, the massive contingent of New York City policemen who were assigned to crowd control reported “rivers of urine” which flowed from the girls and young women in attendance, they were in such genuinely altered states. They were so excited and beside themselves that they were literally ‘unconscious’ to controlling their bodily functions.”

Here’s another take on the fans’ out-of-body excitement and uncontrollable urges:
Did Beatle fans wet their pants at concerts??

Fans at Shea Stadium in 1965Fans at Shea Stadium in 1965

Clearly, MI5, MI6, together with the British Monarchy and Parliament had to make a very swift command decision to hide the death of Paul McCartney.  The following quote from Guitar World’s article titled “Did Paul McCartney Actually Die in 1966?” reveals more of the inside story.

Screen Shot 2015-03-01 at 5.01.10 PM

The Replacement Of Paul McCartney — Why? And by Whom?

The article below, as it turns out, was published by a tabloid-styled, faux-journalism website by the name of World News Daily Report.  However, it contains a general narrative regarding the Paul McCartney story which could actually be true … right down to the exact dates and details.

That the real Paul McCartney left the ‘world scene’ on November 9th of 1966 is an absolute certainty for those initiated into this particular line of inquiry and investigation.  Their only questions relate to why MI5 (Military Intelligence, Section 5) arranged for his removal.  And, exactly who did they replace him with?

Their underlying theory goes like this: Paul McCartney’s 1966 death was the result of an MI5* Black Operation overseen by the Tavistock Institute. The BEATLES, it was understood, had way too much POWER AND INFLUENCE for the British Intelligence Services not to take advantage of it.  How to practically harness such power and influence, however, remained a very difficult task, especially given the indomitable John Lennon and deeply spiritual George Harrison.

Paul McCartney’s Death in 1966 Goes Much Deeper Than an MI5 Replacement Operation - 500 x 308

*The Security Service, commonly known as MI5 (Military Intelligence, Section 5), is the United Kingdom’s domestic counter-intelligence and security agency and is part of its intelligence machinery alongside the Secret Intelligence Service (SIS; also known as MI6) focused on foreign threats, Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) and Defence Intelligence (DI).
(Source: MI5)

The ‘drug overdose’ death of their first manager — Brian Epstein — in 1967 devastated The  BEATLES, as it was meant to.  His knowledge of Paul’s death led to serious personal problems, as well as posed a hugely unpredictable public issue.  That George Harrison lost his bouts with throat cancer, lung cancer and a brain tumor at the age of 58 are also considered suspect by many.  Then there was John Lennon’s shocking assassination at 40 years old by “Manchurian Candidate” Mark David Chapman which was the direct result of his ardent anti-war stance and incessant world peace message.

The BEATLES Lead The British Invasion Bands

The key piece of this ongoing and originally British musical phenomenon, known as the British Invasion, revolves around the BEATLES, and especially the original Macca — Paul McCartney.  For it was Paul who was the premier singer for the first and most famous of all the British Invasion Bands to invade North America.  In that very special and unique capacity did Paul exert an inordinate degree of influence over a musical era defined as the “Golden Age of Rock” (sometimes labeled the “Golden Age of Modern Music“).

Starting in the early 1960’s, The BEATLES arrival in New York City on February 7, 1964 marked the beginning of a worldwide musical revolution that would continue until the mid-1980’s.  Sometimes known as the “Rock and Roll Revolution“, this global movement respected no boundaries and utilized the universal language of music (and English) to transform the entire planetary civilization.  British rock groups have consistently occupied the top 7 or 8 positions of the “TOP 10 Rock ‘n’ Roll Bands Of All Times” lists with The BEATLES always at the #1 spot.


Screen Shot 2015-03-03 at 8.02.20 AM

What is not very well known is that throughout the development and evolution of the Rock and Roll Revolution, there were always two sides operating in the background trying hard — VERY hard — to influence the direction … and the content … and the spirit of the movement.  Only by comprehending his role as the mega-Macca[1] in this often covert, multi-decade, Anglo-American operation will the real back story of Paul McCartney be properly understood.  So will the true conspiracy behind his death and cover up, as well as his purposeful replacement.

[1] Macca:

“A person possessing extremely large sex appeal in spite of being a care bear. Possibly the most gorgeous and sexy and cute thing ever invented, better than The Beatles and Darius put together. Also has good taste in music and smells nice.”
(Source: Macca)

One last series of revelations about the 1966 death of Paul McCartney comes in the form of a book by author Dr. Nick Kollerstrom who is featured in the following video titled:
Who is Paul McCartney?  Published in September,2015, The Life and Death of Paul McCartney 1942 – 1966: A very English Mystery offers a riveting account of the true history of the Beatles and in particular Paul’s untimely death.

VIDEO: Who is Paul McCartney?

Did Ringo Starr Admit Paul McCartney Died In 1966, Replaced With Look-Alike?

The following article appeared on a site that is often used to leak truths into the public domain.  While the exact facts surrounding Ringo Starr’s involvement may or may not be true, the background Beatles material certainly fits with the most likely historical narrative. Removes Original Reference To Paul’s Death On Google Which Appeared On Ringo Starr’s Personal Facebook Page



by Barbara Johnson


Beverly Hills| The former drummer of the Beatles, Ringo Starr, surprised the world this morning during an interview in his luxurious Californian residence, when he admitted that the 45-year old rumors about the alleged death of Paul McCartney in 1966 were actually true.

In an exclusive interview with the Hollywood Inquirer, Mr. Starr explained that the “real” Paul McCartney had died in a car crash on November 9 1966, after an argument during a Beatles’ recording session. To spare the public from grief, the Beatles replaced him with a man named William Shears Campbell, who was the winner of a McCartney look-alike contest and who happened to have the same kind of jovial personality as Paul.

“When Paul died, we all panicked!” claims Ringo, obviously very emotional. “We didn’t know what to do, and Brian Epstein, our manager, suggested that we hire Billy Shears as a temporary solution. It was supposed to last only a week or two, but time went by and nobody seemed to notice, so we kept playing along. Billy turned out to be a pretty good musician and he was able to perform almost better than Paul. The only problem was that he couldn’t get along with John, at all.”

William Shears Campbell, better known as Billy Shears, does indeed “disappear ” from records in 1966 and no traces of him can be found after Paul’s alleged death.

Paul McCartney Death 1966 MI5

Mr. Starr alleges that the group did send out a lot of hidden messages through the years to prepare the population for the truth.

He notably says that the entire Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band album was awash with Paul-is-dead clues: the Beatles had indeed officially formed a “new” band featuring a “fictional” member named Billy Shears, which happened to be the actual name of Paul’s replacement.

“We felt guilty about the deception” added Ringo Starr. “We wanted to tell the world the truth, but we were afraid of the reactions it would provoke. We thought the whole planet was going to hate us for all the lies we had told, so we kept lying but sending subtle clues to relieve our consciousness. When the first rumors finally began about the whole thing, we felt very nervous and started fighting a lot with each other. At some point, it was too much for John and he decided to leave the band.”

Ringo Starr claims that he finally decided to tell the truth, because he was afraid that it was going to die with him. At age 74, he is the only other surviving member of the famous band besides Paul McCartney, and he was afraid the deception would never be revealed.


The rumors of Paul’s death began more than 45 years ago, but had always been dismissed as nonsense by the band and its entourage. In September 1969, American college students published a series of articles in which they claimed that clues to McCartney’s death could be found among the lyrics and artwork of the Beatles’ recordings. Clue-hunting rapidly proved infectious, and within a few weeks, it had become an international phenomenon. Rumours only declined after a contemporary interview with McCartney was published in Life magazine in November 1969.

Neither Paul McCartney nor anyone from his entourage have commented on Ringo Starr’s declaration yet, but the interview has already provoked a lot of reactions around the world. Journalists and paparazzis from around the world have surrounded the residence of the musician only minutes after the interview was broadcasted and are awaiting for the star to comment on the allegations.

The British MI5 also announced an investigation to determine if an imposter could have indeed posed for 48 years as the Member of the Order of the British Empire, Sir James Paul McCartney, during official ceremonies involving Queen Elizabeth II.

      •  END OF ARTICLE  * * *


Special Note:

It is definitely possible that Paul’s replacement was unaware of any furtive plots hatched by MI5 to control the biggest rock band of the era.  In that case, where he was installed to coverup a truly accidental death of the real Paul, the following perspective is offered for the reader’s consideration.

It must be acknowledged that Paul McCartney’s replacement was tasked with one of the toughest jobs in the world. Regardless of who he really is, the new Paul (some call him Faul) was certainly coerced (or simply assigned by MI5) to play a roll that only preordained destiny could have fatefully brought to him in 1966. In this light, his was perhaps one of the greatest sacrifices made in modern times. For he was compelled to leave behind his real identity for the rest of his life in the interest of the greater good for all of humankind. Yes, he got to play a rock ‘n’ roll superstar, but that’s not nearly as fun or easy as it sounds.

Now many may say, as many have already said, that he was, and is, an imposter. No, he is not an imposter!

In reality, all of us are called upon from time to time to be or act like something that we are not. We spontaneously fill that vital role in the moment because it is ours to do. In the case of Paul McCartney’s replacement, his noble and selfless deed surely saved the lives of who knows how many across the planet?

Again, this highly qualified perspective is being presented in the event that Paul’s replacement was truly unaware of any designs by British secret services to use The BEATLES to advance a clandestine worldwide agenda.


The following excerpt comes from a post at under the title
“Paul is Dead: New evidence based on computer enhanced forensic technique”.

Screen Shot 2015-03-10 at 8.36.10 AM

Did Ringo Starr Admit Paul McCartney Died In 1966, Replaced With Look-Alike? | SOTN: Alternative News & Commentary


Source: The Millennium Report

You may also like...

12 responses

  1. Darrah Smith says:

    Despite what people think of Heather Mills, it must be mentioned that she made some pretty profound statements on talks shows regarding this … saying “the public isn’t ready for the truth” and “I have a box of evidence that will come to light if anything happens to me”. Listen to her interviews.

  2. The Dude says:

    The thing I notice is the hair part. You don’t change that later in life. It has to do with being left or right handed.

  3. Clare Kuehn says:

    There is no support that Ringo would ever speak now, other than sidewise comments which he has made. However, that Paul died is quite clear for anyone willing to consider the evidence with an equal-handed approach. True, more and easier evidence would be subpoenaed for any court, but the materials already marshalled demonstrate the detail and best explanation is that Paul died and was replaced; heck, many people noticed but *did not have such a conception to explain it with*. For detailed discussion, see but for the eyes, since that article cannot currently be edited to include them, see (partway down). For an overview (minus eyes, and only glossing over the ear cartilage and some other issues, watch . When one is prejudiced, one needs reminders of ordinary methods of reasoning, even if one does not want to hear them, and that video goes into that as well as the biography, some about the voice, mannerisms, abilities (both Paul and his replacement “Bill/ Faul — False Paul/ Sir Paul” have abilities and certain charms or problems in personality, but the differences are what are key for determining the two). — And yes, Darrah Smith, Heather Mills stumbled upon something Beatles-related which shocked her and gave her serious pause (suicidal thoughts, among other things), as well as some insurance for her life, which came under threat, according to many interviews she did. It is not worth our while as some do, to put her down as “a liar”, since her manner and wording are quite hedging, circuitous (cautious), while being damning of regular “Beatle Machine” truth. So yes, given the situation about the replacement, that has to be what she is talking of (especially once one knows about the replacement, it fits perfectly).

  4. Clare Kuehn says:

    We should also note that the so-called “Last Testament of George Harrison” movie is not only a spoof (with some accurate aspects) but actual disinformation. A good article (thoughon a somewhat problematic Website, itself) is

  5. Clare Kuehn says:

    Ringo’s real statements on the issue were: a) “The clues were really clever, actually; if you put them together, they say that Paul is dead.” Then he threw in a doubt. b) “I am the last remaining Beatle, not Paul.” c) “He (Paul) doesn’t even bother with that, anymore.” (Liverpudlian accent). — These references are from: old broadcast (unknown to me at this point, but reproduced in audio on a show), article where writer tries to take Ringo as joking,, and a recent interview on TV with Ellen at at 4:08 (and he mentions 1966 earlier in the interview — with a worried look — but gives the regular excuse of the difficult music situation for concert vs studio development, but that was part, not the whole situation never to tour ever again, starting in late 1966). But this is nothing in the way of proof individually speaking. For that, you need the eyes and the ear cartilage, properly talked of and all the rest is part of the general case, all tending to the same conclusion when considered in part or whole, deciding at end what is the best explanation, without rushing to stop because one can think of an objection for anything along the way. RIP Paul.

  6. Lisa Barrett says:

    Yellow Submarine LSD trip ~ John Lennon opposed MK Ultra programming

  7. Christie C. says:

    The more I look into this, the more convinced I am that at least 3 of the original Beatles met equal fates. I a short clip that is said to have been produced by “Billy Shears” in 2014, and is on YouTube, I tried going frame by frame through it, and the imagery is shocking gory to say the least. One picture in particular troubled me even more than the others, and it was a picture taken from the Sgt. Pepper cover. In it, the original Beatles are all presented as standing to the left[our right when looking at the picture], and I noticed that George’s tie was tied directly around his neck, so didn’t go underneath his collar. That struck me as a bit scary, since the ties on the other Beatles are shown as being normally placed under their collars. Why would George’s be shown tied around his neck?! They also show depictions of John with his eyes closed as in death, and all 4 of them dismembered. I believe in the picture in which they all posed with baby body parts all over them, that they never took that seriously. You can tell just by looking at their expressions, but I think who ever was behind the idea for that picture had a much more sinister reason for having them pose with those body parts. In that extremely short video by “Billy Shears”, it is definitely depicted with all 4 Beatles having been physically dismembered, and the whole thing is really gory. So, perhaps those who now are beginning to think the nwo characters/Tavistock[?] had them all killed off, and replaced with doubles/doppelgangers, who were deliberately groomed to be as much like all 4 Beatles as was possible. So very sad! That’s why I do not trust any interview given by “Ringo”–looking at the “Ringo” now, verses the original Ringo Starkey, and, to my eyes, the differences are so obvious–now–only because I’ve begun to look at them all with far more critical eyes than I ever have before.

  8. Clare Kuehn says:

    You’re staring too hard, Christie C. Ringo is Ringo, John is John. They did mature but they are totally plausible. What’s not plausible at all are some photos and voice and emotional stances of Paul as the same. Don’t think it’s more complex than it is. It’s bad; but it’s not stupidly bad (all replaced, etc.).

  9. joe blow says:

    it goes much deeper i think the car crash is a cover and really paul was killed ritually like so many. if you are sadly for you aware of these kind of rituals you will know what i mean. this changed the beatles music making the other member understandably scared and morbid. you hear it in the music see it on thier faces. thier is a deep but hidden terror in it also the alteration and additions to the music by tavistock. just the tip of the iceberg hope for you that you don’t go there. i went there and back again I’m not afraid of these fuckers nothing will intimidate me. yeah. no fear people we can overcome anything any evil any time any place any number bring it on banish it out. peace with eyes open

  10. Tori says:

    I was a their concert in 1965 at Shea Stadium. I never saw any evidence of rivers of urine.

  11. Kylie says:

    Paul is ALIVE!!!

  1. August 25, 2016

    […] Paul McCartney’s Death in 1966 Goes Much Deeper Than an MI5 Replacement Operation […]

Leave a Reply to Christie C. Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »